Banksy versus Bristol Museum – The Power of a Big Golden Frame

Banksy was here.

Banksy was here.

The first thing to note in Bristol is that it feels a lot like San Francisco. The second thing to note in Bristol is the long queue in front of the Bristol Museum and Art Gallery. Nevermind any further comparison between Bristol and San Francisco. What about the queue? They had all come to see the work of Banksy, Britain’s most (in)famous street artist.

But why? And why would he showcase his stuff in a museum?

For starters, it has to be acknowledged that Banksy’s work is truly amazing. His pieces convey simple, straightforward messages through powerful imagery. If only more artists would possess this skill.

The imagery mainly captures symbolic mismatches, even symbolic collisions. So we find protest police happily dancing through a flower field or riding on a rocking horse. An ancient nude sculpture dressed like a suicide bomber. A grandma fixing an anarchist’s face cover to make sure it looks okay. Most controversially, a Muslim woman wearing an apron that shows a half-naked female body with lingerie (see my pictures here).

Where are they running?

Where are they running?

All of this somehow feels unusual, uncomfortable, or even disturbing. We’ve seen images of protest police and we learned what to associate with them. We’ve seen flower fields and rocking horses and know what they represent. But protest police and flower fields put together? We’re confused.

I am also confused about people’s reaction to this kind of art. When you watch them, you can tell that they don’t know what to do. A lot of them smile or laugh uncomfortably. They appreciate the genius of the artist and the moment they are confronted with something extraordinary, something unusual. And then what?

Found inside a big gold frame

Found inside a big gold frame

Banksy has a political message. Do visitors to his exhibition see it underneath the creativity of his work? Probably. Do they reflect on it to the point that they go out and change something (if only their own life)? I’m not so sure.

Why did Banksy choose to show his street art in a museum? Street art is mainly a form of protest and resistance that is by definition marginal, and therefore not meant for a mainstream museum.

Unless… Unless the entire exhibition is Banksy’s latest work of art. I had the suspicion he was standing in some corner watching all of us smiling away at the protest police dancing through a flower field. Wasn’t he just mocking the world of art? Wasn’t he just making fun of museums as commercial institutions?

A phrase inside a big golden frame read, “Never underestimate the power of a big gold frame.”

The leaflet handed out at the exhibition had a red star in the caption to denote any “Attraction of outstanding merit”. There were no red stars on the museum map.

3 responses to “Banksy versus Bristol Museum – The Power of a Big Golden Frame

  1. I really want to go to this exhibition, when does it come to London?
    Although I have to say, I think his work feels uncomfortable to watch, as you say, because it’s not in its ‘natural’ environment.
    If anything it’s meant to question what we consider art. For some reason it reminds me of Takashi Murakami’s exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum last year, where – as part of the exhibit – there were people outside the building selling knockoff Louis Vuitton handbags, which where actually originals by the artist. I find it amazing that today the scope of what is ‘art’ is so broad and I think these two are good examples of that. Personally, I enjoy them both even if they might seem to stand for completely opposite things. Great post Sebs!

  2. Good morning Flo! I don’t think it’s coming to London, unfortunately. But if you find the time, you should go on a trip to Bristol. It’s a really nice and artsy place. I will definitely look up Takashi Murakami, sounds very interesting.

    I also had this “art” installation at the Tate Modern in mind, the one with the slides you could go on. What makes it art is the people using the slides, just like the people buying the handbags, or the people interacting with the Banksy stuff. Is that “meta-art”, art about art?

  3. Here’s a bit of Murakami if you want to have a look. Also, I found this quote by him which I found really interesting and could relate it to Banksy’s sort of mocking what we usually consider art:
    “When I consider what Japanese culture is like, the answer is that it all is subculture. Therefore, art is unnecessary.” – Takashi Murakami

    http://www.takashimurakami.net/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s